Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Dormaier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an option to purchase ranch property in eastern Oregon. The trial court entered a decree in favor of defendant denying plaintiff’s request for specific performance, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

As Mrs. Dormaier is only a nominal party defendant, we shall refer to Mr. Dormaier as the defendant. Defendant’s wheat ranch in Sherman County was heavily mortgaged and for financial reasons he decided to sell a portion. He contacted Carl Joplin, a realtor who was also a good friend, and Joplin introduced him to the plaintiff. Plaintiff had recently moved…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Medak v. HekimianOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Prall v. GOODEN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Blank v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindemeier v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lyle v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Seal v. PolehnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Atwood v. Real Estate CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Lyle v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API