Legal Opinion

Uhlmann v. Kin Daw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1920PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From Marion: George G. Bingham, Judge. Department 1. This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on a leasehold estate and a crop of hops. William Uhlmann, William J. Wannamaker, Ferdinand Goebel, and J. W. Kanfmann are partners doing business under the firm name of S. & F. Uhlmann. The partners reside in the City of New York, and their principal place of business is in that city, although the firm has for a long time transacted business in Oregon.

Read the full summary

From Marion: George G. Bingham, Judge. Department 1. This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage on a leasehold estate and a crop of hops. William Uhlmann, William J. Wannamaker, Ferdinand Goebel, and J. W. Kanfmann are partners doing business under the firm name of S. & F. Uhlmann. The partners reside in the City of New York, and their principal place of business is in that city, although the firm has for a long time transacted business in Oregon. George H. Benedict, who resides in Portland, Oregon, and who maintains an office there, has been acting as agent for the partnership since 1907, and he…

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The papers which were executed on March 16, 1916, were signed and delivered in Portland, Multnomah County; while, as already stated, the hop farm is located in Marion County, and the partnership’s main office is in the City of New York. A certificate of the partnership’s assumed name was filed in Marion County on January 27, 1916; and on March 8, 1918, subsequent to the execution of the agreement and mortgage, but prior to the commencement of this suit, a like certificate was filed in Multnomah County. The plea in abatement filed by Kin Daw was predicated on the theory that the failure to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Pangborn v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Mail-Well Envelope Company v. SaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Gallafent v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API