Legal Opinion
Case v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1963No. Civ. 26839PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment which among other things granted defendants’ motions for declaratory judgment on the pleadings and declared the validity and constitutionality of an approval of a conditional use by city authorities to the individual respondents herein.
The complaint filed herein on November 6, 1961, was in seven counts and alleged generally that Bentley, Watts and Hunter, sometimes hereinafter referred to as the individual respondents, were the owners of 47 acres of land zoned Rl-H located on Cahuenga Boulevard in Los Angeles to the immediate west of the Hollywood Freeway;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Clemons v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Stoddard v. EdelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Schultz v. Board of Adjust. of Pottawattamie Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.