Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Herman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 1975No. 45239PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was originally commenced to rescind a purchase agreement involving a Minneapolis apartment complex. That issue was settled out of court. The litigation now on appeal involves a dispute between two defendants, one of whom claims a commission for services rendered as a real estate broker in connection with the property.

Edward M. Carlin is a licensed real estate broker doing business as Edwards Realty, a division of C & Z Investments, Inc. Alen Herman was at all pertinent times the sole owner of the Williamsburg Estates apartment complex located in Minneapolis.

In May 1970 and August…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mollico v. MollicoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Palatine National Bank of Palatine v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Jara v. BUCKBEE-MEARS CO., ST. PAULCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Allstun v. C.J.G.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Redman v. SinexDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API