Legal Opinion
Redman v. Sinex
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 22, 2009No. 08-CV-1355 (JMR/FLN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff asks the Court to grant summary judgment in his favor and dismiss defendant’s counterclaims. His motions are granted.
I. Background 1
Plaintiff, James Redman, and defendant, Barry Sinex, met as neighbors in 1993 and grew to be close friends. Defendant invented aircraft maintenance software, and founded Sinex Aviation Technologies Co. (“SATC”) to market his products. At some point in the 1990s, plaintiff invested $200,000 in SATC stock.
In October 2001, plaintiff lent defendant $300,000 to build a house. The loan was evidenced by a promissory…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ascente Business Consulting, LLC v. DR myCommerceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018