Legal Opinion

Miller v. Rose

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 2000No. COA99-432PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Jack K. Miller, appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendants, Bill and Julee Rose, on plaintiffs claims for breach of contract and creation of a parol resulting trust. Defendants cross-appeal from an order dismissing their counterclaim against plaintiff for unfair and deceptive trade practices. Based upon our examination of the record, we conclude that the orders of summary judgment and dismissal were properly entered.

The evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, tends to show the following facts: In or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Overstreet v. Brookland, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC v. County of CabarrusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Acosta v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Lassiter v. Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API