Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Roth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 2001No. 68A01PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to enforce a mediated settlement agreement that provided, as a condition of the settlement, for a release “mutually agreeable to both parties.” For the reasons which follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

On 11 February 1999 plaintiff Stacey J. Chappell filed an action against defendant Anthony W. Roth (a/k/a Tony Rothe or Tony Roth) and unnamed defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance Company seeking damages for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creech v. MelnikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Normile v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. May v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Se. Caissons, LLC v. Choate Constr. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Media Network, Inc. v. Long Haymes Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Ales v. T. A. Loving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API