Legal Opinion

Goeckel v. Stokely

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1952No. 528PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant’s assignments of error challenge the action of the trial court in (1) overruling his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, (2) charging the jury on the second issue, and (3) limiting the defendant’s counterclaim-recovery to $107.41.

1. The refusal to nonsuit. — The defendant takes the position that his letter of 7 February, 1951, to the plaintiff sets forth the terms of his offer of employment, and that the plaintiff after receiving the letter came to Charlotte and entered upon the work of the defendant. On these facts, the defendant contends the plaintiff accepted the terms of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Kirby v. Stokes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Sprinkle v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Neuse Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Normile v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Barry Rowland v. Sandy Morris FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API