Legal Opinion

Sprinkle v. Ponder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1951No. 99PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

At tbe time of tbe marriage between tbe plaintiff and Macie Black Sprinkle in 1927, sbe was Irving witb ber two daughters, Pearl (wbo is tbe defendant, Pearl Black Ponder) and Alice (now Alice Bradley) in tbe borne of ber aunt Nan Black, referred to tbrougbout tbe trial as Aunt Nan, on tbe aunt’s farm located on tbe New Stock Road near Weaverville in Buncombe Oounty. Tbe plaintiff, W. D. Sprinkle, “was batching” on bis 75-acre farm across tbe road from Aunt Nan’s place. After tbe marriage, be moved in witb tbe family at Aunt Nan’s borne, and stayed there two or three years. During this period…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Dodds v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Boyce v. McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API