Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Wheeler

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902No. Sac. No. 973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, and U. S. Webb, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit, in the nature of quo warranto, to oust the defendant from the office described in the complaint as that of “county physician,” or, as otherwise described, “the office of hospital physician of Plumas County,” Judgment was entered for the defendant on demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiff -appeals.

The defendant, who is a graduate in medicine, was appointed by the board of supervisors under subdivision 5 of section 25 of the County Government Act of 1897 (Stats. 1897, p. 458) to attend to the indigent sick and dependent poor of the county, and to the patients in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ford v. Board of State Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. County of El Dorado v. MeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Dwyer v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ventura County v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Ryan v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API