Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Parker

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1897No. S. F. No. 345PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. John Reynolds, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Henshaw J.

This action is in mandate. Plaintiff seeks to compel defendant, auditor of Santa Clara county, to draw his warrant upon the county treasurer in favor of plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and forty-one dollars for fees as justice of the peace, to which it is alleged plaintiff is legally entitled. By stipulation the parties agreed upon all matters of fact, and here present, as their controversy, the single legal ques-y tion of the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of an act of the legislature entitled “ an act to establish the *547fees of county, and township, and other officers,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. County of Orange v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cooley v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Comanche Light Power Co. v. Nix, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Hilton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API