Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Board of Trustees

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1890No. 13480PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Action for a writ of mandate to the board of trustees and others, above mentioned, to compel them to levy a special tax to raise a sum of money to pay the salaries of policemen, etc. Judgment was rendered for the petitioners, and the respondent appealed.

The city of Sacramento is a municipal corporation, organized in 1863, under an act of the legislature. (Stats. 1863, pp. 415 et seq.) The board of trustees is, under that act, the governing body of the corporation. (Stats. 1863, sec. 2, p. 416), and by it the board was invested with power to create and establish a city police, to prescribe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weill v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ford v. Board of State Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brown v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API