Legal Opinion

County of El Dorado v. Meiss

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1893No. 18107PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

On March 3,1891, the board of supei’visors of El Dorado county passed an ordinance requiring “every person engaged in the business of raising, grazing, herding or pasturing sheep and goats, or sheep or goats,” in that county, to procure from the license tax collector a license therefor. The ordinance made it the duty of the license collector to collect the license, and further provided that he might enforce the collection, “ as provided by section 3360 of the Political Code”; that is, by action brought for that purpose in the name of the people of the State.

In April, 1891, the supervisors of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lassen County v. ConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lewis v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API