Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Riley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 7, 1924No. Civ. No. 2743PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
On rehearing. This is an original petition seeking a writ of mandate directing and requiring the respondent as the state controller of the state of California to draw a warrant in favor of the petitioner in the sum of $175, alleged to be due him as salary for services rendered as a traffic officer in and for the county of Sacramento, appointed under the provisions of section 30 of the California Motor Vehicle Act, approved May 30, 1923 [Stats. 1923, P. 517]. *
The petition sets forth the various acts taken and performed by the chief of the motor vehicle department of the state of California…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Ristine v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking FundIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Forty-Seventh Legislature v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.