Legal Opinion

Ventura County v. Clay

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. L. A. No. 71PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to enjoin the treasurer of Ventura county from paying an auditor’s warrant in favor of the defendant Bradley for two hundred and forty dollars claimed to be due Bradley for his services in collecting license taxes under an alleged contract with that county, and allowed by the board of supervisors as a valid claim. This action was brought by the district attorney, who contended that the alleged contract of Bradley with the county, and the allowance of Bradley’s claim by the board of supervisors, were unauthorized by law; and, therefore, that this action was authorized by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. County of El Dorado v. MeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. Whipple, No. 2California Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Security-First National Bank v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API