Legal Opinion
Son Broadcasting, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 11, 2002No. 98-115CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss and cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment is denied. Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, more accurately styled a motion for partial summary judgment, is granted.
BACKGROUND
This case involves an alleged contract between plaintiff, Son Broadcasting, Inc., a television broadcasting company based in Santa Fe, New Mexico,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Beard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.