Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 22, 2016No. 13-821CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Money-Mandating Statute and Regulation; Failure to State a Claim; Breach of Express and/or Implied in Fact Contract; Release; Mutual Mistake; Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Statute of Limitations.

OPINION

HORN, J.

Plaintiffs Ingham Regional Medical Center (Ingham), Bay Regional Medical Center (BRMC), McLaren Northern Michigan (McLaren), Gifford Medical Center, Inc. (Gif-ford), and Lakewood Health System (Lakewood) operate hospitals that participated in the TRICARE program, a federal program providing health care to uniformed service members, retirees, and certain others.…

2Cases cited194 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  4. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  5. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API