Legal Opinion
Leonardo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 17, 2004No. 01-641 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This case is before the court on a single issue-the authority of the government representative to bind the United States-not decided by the court in its prior opinion on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. See Leonardo v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 344 (2003). Plaintiff seeks damages for breach of contract by the government. Plaintiffs claim arises out of the destruction of her artwork while stored in the American Cultural Center in Brussels, Belgium.
I. Background1
Plaintiff is a professional artist. Complaint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lublin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Csx Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.