Legal Opinion

Beard v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 29, 2016No. 15-152 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Forest Service stewardship, breach of contract, contract interpretation, lost profits, reasonably foreseeable damages

OPINION AND ORDER

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

Plaintiffs Dennis and Kimberly Beard (“Plaintiffs” or “the Beards”) are the former owners of Dinkey Creek Inn, a seasonal resort located in the Sierra National Forest and subject to administration by the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”). Plaintiffs operated this resort pursuant to a term special use permit (“permit” or “Permit Agreement”), which granted the Beards long-term use of the land in exchange for an annual fee.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Bruhn Newtech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. Castillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  5. Flint v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API