Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 21, 2002No. 96-666CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Plaintiff brought an action against the government, seeking damages in the amount of $14,389,853.00, for an alleged breach of a contract with the government. The court issued two earlier opinions in this case, denying defendant’s motions to dismiss. See Bailey v. United States, 40 Fed.Cl. 449 (1998) and 46 Fed.Cl. 187 (2000). Issues addressed in the prior motions included the jurisdictional bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1994), the doctrine of res judicata and the criminal forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 853 (1994). This opinion is being issued following an extensive opportunity…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cornejo-Ortega v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Leonardo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- In re BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Uecker & Associates, Inc. v. L.G. Hunt & Associates, Inc. (In Re American Basketball League, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.