Legal Opinion

Sholes v. Fernando

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 2011No. 2 CA-CV 2010-0216, 2 CA-CV 2010-0217PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Russell, Mary, and Bruce Sholes (collectively “the Sholes”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment determining the parties’ ownership interests in Oasis at Wild Horse Ranch, LLC (Oasis) and in two residential properties. The Sholes argue there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s determination that Judy FernandoSholes and Raynu Fernando each owned an interest in Oasis, the court erred in allocating ownership among the parties, the court erred in determining Bruce had “abandoned” the cash he asserted he had contributed as capital in Oasis, and the court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Donges v. USAA Fed. Sav. BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  5. Price v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API