Legal Opinion

Donges v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 30, 2019No. CV-18-00093-TUC-RMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Rosemary Márquez, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs William and Carolyn Donges' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 54) and Defendant USAA Federal Savings Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 64).1

*910The summary judgment motions are fully briefed and suitable for determination without oral argument. For the following reasons, summary judgment will be granted in favor of Defendant.

I. Standard of Review

Summary judgment is proper "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. CSAA General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  2. Roberta Linderman, on behalf of Plaintiff and the class members described herein v. NewRez LLC, doing business as Shellpoint, and The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  3. Webster Bank v. MutkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API