The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Estela Guthrie, as personal representative of the Estate of Josefa DeCamacho and on behalf of DeCamaeho’s statutory beneficiaries, appeals from the trial court’s order compelling arbitration of her claims against La Solana Care and Rehab, Inc. and Infinia at Douglas, Inc. (“La Solana”). On appeal, Guthrie argues the signed contract containing an arbitration clause, upon which the court’s order was based, is neither valid nor enforceable. She also contends the contract’s arbitration clause does not apply to the statutory beneficiaries’ claims brought under…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- BOLER v. SECURITY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Mary E. Roth and Michael A. Roth, Individually and as Coexecutors of the Estate of Cletus Roth, Anna M. Roth, Individually, and Bradley E. Roth, Individually v. the Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society D/B/A Good Samaritan Society - GeorgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Gullett ex rel. Estate of Gullett v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.