Holmes v. American States Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
{1 Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in granting appellees' summary judgment motions and in denying his Rule 56F) motion. Appellant contends he made a pri-ma facie showing that appellees violated several statutes governing commerce in motor vehicles, thereby precluding summary judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
2 Because this is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Glover ex rel. Dyson v. Boy Scouts of Am., 923 P.2d 1888, 1884 (Utah 1996).
T3 This case arises from a chain of events…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilson v. Valley Mental HealthUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Mast v. OversonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Peterson v. South Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robinson v. Tripco Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Mason v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- McKesson Corp. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Smith's Food & Drug, Inc. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.