Wilson v. Valley Mental Health
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
This case is before us on appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Valley Mental Health. Plaintiffs John and Esther Wilson -argue that the trial court erred in ruling that under section 78-14a-102(l) of the Code, Valley Mental Health had no duty to protect their daughter, Jay-leen Kilgrow, or their grandchildren from the conduct of Ronnie Kilgrow, Jayleen’s ex-husband and the children’s father. Ronnie Kil-grow had been brought to Valley Mental Health by a police officer for treatment and was released. Later that same day he strangled Jayleen and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- B.R. v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Yazd v. Woodside Homes Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- Young Ex Rel. Young v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Wood v. University of Utah Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Gilger v. HernandezUtah Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.