Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Valley Mental Health

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1998No. 970308PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This case is before us on appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Valley Mental Health. Plaintiffs John and Esther Wilson -argue that the trial court erred in ruling that under section 78-14a-102(l) of the Code, Valley Mental Health had no duty to protect their daughter, Jay-leen Kilgrow, or their grandchildren from the conduct of Ronnie Kilgrow, Jayleen’s ex-husband and the children’s father. Ronnie Kil-grow had been brought to Valley Mental Health by a police officer for treatment and was released. Later that same day he strangled Jayleen and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. B.R. v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Yazd v. Woodside Homes Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Young Ex Rel. Young v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wood v. University of Utah Medical CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Gilger v. HernandezUtah Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API