Legal Opinion

Peterson v. South Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1999No. 980109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

¶ 1 The plaintiff, Gayle S. Petersen (“Petersen”), owner of a properly licensed sexually oriented business, filed an action to enjoin the defendant, South Salt Lake City (“the City”), from denying her the right to change the physical location of her business without obtaining a new license, and from denying her the right to locate in a building that was more than 600 feet from the nearest sexually oriented business. The City moved for summary judgment and Petersen cross-motioned. The trial court granted summary judgment to the City. It reasoned that Petersen’s “business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. A.C. Financial, Inc. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Workman v. Brighton Properties, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API