Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsay

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 29, 2000No. 990739-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

{1 Defendant Michael Cole Lindsay entered guilty pleas on various drug-related felonies. Lindsay conditioned his pleas of guilt on his right to appeal the trial court's conclusion regarding his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § Ti-29-1 (1999). See State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 985, 989 (Utah Ct.App.1988). Lindsay, who lodged an invocation of his speedy trial | right with the prison warden, argues the claims against him should have been dismissed for violation of the statute. We disagree and affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 On July 23, 1998, Lindsay, who was on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gohler v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HeatonUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Horton v. Royal Order of the SunUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wilson v. Valley Mental HealthUtah Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. State v. MahiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  4. D.K.S. v. C.S.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API