State v. Lindsay
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
{1 Defendant Michael Cole Lindsay entered guilty pleas on various drug-related felonies. Lindsay conditioned his pleas of guilt on his right to appeal the trial court's conclusion regarding his statutory right to a speedy trial pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § Ti-29-1 (1999). See State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 985, 989 (Utah Ct.App.1988). Lindsay, who lodged an invocation of his speedy trial | right with the prison warden, argues the claims against him should have been dismissed for violation of the statute. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 On July 23, 1998, Lindsay, who was on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gohler v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HeatonUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Horton v. Royal Order of the SunUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilson v. Valley Mental HealthUtah Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. MahiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- D.K.S. v. C.S.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.