Legal Opinion

Mast v. Overson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 31, 1998No. 971586-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Plaintiff David K. Mast appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Brent Overson. Specifically, Mast argues the trial court erred in concluding that Overson’s statements were not defamatory as a matter of law and in not permitting Mast to conduct discovery regarding these statements. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and recite the facts accordingly. See Hodgson v. Bunzl Utah, Inc., 844 P.2d 331, 333 (Utah 1992).

This case…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogan v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Holmes v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  3. Pipkin v. AcumenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Lichfield v. KublerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
  5. Martineau v. CurruttDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API