Legal Opinion
Hurt v. United States
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided June 21, 1995No. 2:95-0075PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the Government’s motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs, Charles and Carolyn Hurt, have responded, the Government has replied and plaintiffs have surreplied. 1 The matter is ripe for adjudication.
I
In their complaint, plaintiffs seek injunc-tive and monetary damages. They allege the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has engaged in a pattern of harassment against them in retaliation for Mr. Hurt’s representation of clients in civil actions initiated against the IRS in 1973. Complaint at ¶ III. Plaintiffs contend the IRS has…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. AlfredDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- McClenathan v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Wilson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. RossottiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- McCoy v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.