Legal Opinion

McCoy v. United States Postal Service

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided July 6, 1995No. Civ. A. 6:94-0959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are the motions by Defendants United States Postal Service and United States Office of Personnel Management Retirement Programs to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment and the motion of Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) for summary judgment. Plaintiff has declined to respond 1 to either motion although the response period has lapsed. 2 After careful consideration of the merits of each motion, the Court concludes, for the reasons that follow, both motions should be granted.

I

Plaintiff initiated this action…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Chaplin Marine Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  2. McLean v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API