Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 27, 2002No. Civ.A. WMN-01-2672PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Stay or Enjoin Enforcement of Administrative Summons (Paper No. 11) and a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Rossotti, Dorsey, Breslan, Hampel, and Miller (“Individual Defendants” or “Defendants”) (Paper No. 13). The motions have been exhaustively briefed and are ripe for decision. Upon review of the pleadings and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6), and that Plaintiffs motion will be denied and Defendants’ motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a highly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- United States v. Judicial Watch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002