Nash v. Mahan

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

In a quiet title action, the trial court found that respondents Nash adversely possessed a portion of land to which appellants Mahan had record title. Mahans brought this appeal, contending that while Nashs had adversely possessed part of the land, the trial court erred in finding that they adversely possessed the entire portion claimed. We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand.

FACTS

In 1980, respondents Ronald and Charlotte Nash purchased Lot 13 of John Johnson’s Subdivision (“Lot 13”) from Palmer and Dorothy Solheim who had owned the property since 1955.…