Legal Opinion

Engquist v. Wirtjes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1955No. 36,440PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is a boundary-line action. Defendants appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs are the owners of the north half and defendants of the south half of section 21, township 127, range 43, in Grant county, Minnesota. The boundary line between these half sections is in dispute. For convenience the land on which the line is in dispute will be referred to by the names of the owners of the land to the south, which from east to west are the Wirtjes 80, the Kietzman east 80, the Kietzman fractional west 80, and the Werk fractional 40. Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Benz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Fredericksen v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API