Legal Opinion

Stanard v. Urban

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1990No. C4-89-1373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The trial court held that the Urbans had acquired title to a parcel of land by adverse possession and entered judgment in their favor. The Stanards (legal owners) appeal from that judgment contending the trial court erred in its factual findings and legal conclusions. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1963 appellants Stanley and Lois Sta-nard inherited lakeshore property on Lake Koronis legally described as follows:

Lot 6, 7 and 8 except the West 25 feet of Lot 8 all in Block Three (3), HUNTINGTON HEIGHTS, Stearns County, Minnesota.

In 1960, the West 25 feet of Lot Eight had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Olson v. BurkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Simpson v. SheridanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Nash v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FIRST CONG. CHURCH OF ENOSBURG v. ManleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API