Russell-Sage v. Larson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Yellow Medicine county, Powers, J., denying his motion for a new trial, after directing a verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. J.
Ejectment for the recovery of the S. E. | of section 31 in township 116, range 41, in the county of Yellow Medicine. At the close of the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, to the effect that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of the quarter section, except so much thereof as was in the actual possession of the defendant in the year 1878. The excepted portion of the land is shown by the plat of the quarter section designated *123in the record as “Exhibit I.” The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bazille v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Brown v. KohoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Peterson v. P. P. Mast & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lambert v. SteesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Markusen v. MortensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Dunkel v. RothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Dorgeloh v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Nash v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.