Legal Opinion

Ehle v. Prosser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1972No. 43138PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Winona County denying their claims to certain disputed property by reason of adverse possession or establishment of boundary lines as provided by our statutes. Plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s holding that payment of real estate taxes for 5 years is an absolute prerequisite in all cases for establishing title by adverse possession. The evidence supports the claim of plaintiffs to title to the disputed property, and the decision of the trial court is reversed.

Plaintiffs Kay Ehle Kobus and James Ehle are the fee…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  4. Dean v. GoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Seymour, Sabin & Co. v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Morris v. HumphreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API