Legal Opinion

State v. Valle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 2013No. 09C48555; A145111PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence, assigning error to the trial court’s exclusion of impeachment evidence. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court erred in excluding the evidence and that the error was not harmless. Therefore, we reverse and remand.1

Defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and four counts of second-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.425. The charges were based on allegations by M, defendant’s stepdaughter.

In 2008, when M was 16 years old, she wanted to move out…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Romero-Perez v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  2. State v. Del Real-GalvezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. NacosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. Dickerson & ReecySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API