Legal Opinion

City of Winston-Salem v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Upon tbe agreed facts presented in tbe record on tbis appeal these two questions arise in determining whether tbe assessment sued upon is valid: (1) Is tbe property of defendant an abutting property on Cleveland Avenue within tbe meaning of tbe statute, C. S., 2703-2728; Public Laws 1915, cb. 56?(2) By failing to appear in response to notices required by tbe statutes with respect to proposed street and sidewalk improvements, and by failing to appeal from assessments therefor, is defendant now estopped to challenge tbe assessment?

On tbe factual situation shown, each question is answered in tbe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Bennett v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. City of Southport v. StanlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Anderson v. Town of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ballard v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. City of Salisbury v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Municipal Investment Corporation v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. City of Raleigh v. Raleigh City Administrative UnitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API