Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Raleigh v. Raleigh City Administrative Unit

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1DissentWinborne, J.

STACY, C. J., and BARNHILL, J., concur in dissenting opinion. Civil action to collect unpaid assessments charged for local improvements against several lots owned by the defendant in the city of Raleigh.

The defendant admitted the improvements were made and the assessments duly levied, but denied that the assessments were enforceable against its property, for that the same was owned and used exclusively for public school purposes. Defendant also pleaded the ten years' statute of limitations as a bar to all installments which became due ten years or more before the institution of the action. It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Dorothea Dix Hospital v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Warren v. . MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. City of Salisbury v. AreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Raleigh Cemetery Ass'n v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API