Legal Opinion
In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 3, 1956No. 677PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.
It would seem that this appeal may be disposed of on its merits by a consideration of the three contentions urged in the lower court without a seriatim discussion of the numerous exceptions and assignments of error set out in the record.
We shall consider the grounds upon which these contentions are based in the order posed.
Are the acts, pursuant to which the City Council of the City of Durham acted in making these local improvements and assessing the cost thereof, repugnant to Section 29, Article II, of our Constitution?
In our opinion, the acts complained of do not come within the purview of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown v. Road CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Mills v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Storm v. Town of Wrightsville BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Gallimore v. Town of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- City of Salisbury v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- In Re City of Durham Annexation Ordinance Numbered 5991 for Area ACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.