Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Town of Sanford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1923PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiffs contest the validity of the acts purporting to authorize the assessments complained of, assigning for their objection several grounds which require examination.

’ They contend particularly that the act of 1921, Extra Session, is unenforceable because obnoxious to the due process clause of the State and Federal constitutions.

The right of the courts to declare a statute unconstitutional is regarded as a high prerogative which should be exercised with caution and careful attention to probable results. The Legislature is presumed to have observed the limitation of its powers; and if…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API