City of Salisbury v. Barnhardt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
In the hearing below no exceptions were taken to the admission of evidence or to the facts as found by the court. Hence, such findings are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. R.R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486, and cited cases. The exception to the signing of the judgment, however, presents these questions: (1) Do the facts found support the judgment; and (2) does any error of law appear upon the face of the record? Goldsboro v. R.R., supra; Bailey v. Bailey, 243 N.C. 412, 90 S.E. 2d 696; Dellinger v. Bollinger, 242 N.C. 696, 89 S.E. 2d 592;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Lee v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Dellinger v. BollingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Hope Dale Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Columbus County v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Allamakee County v. Collins TrustSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Harris v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.