Legal Opinion
Le Chic Taxicab Co. v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1992No. 91-AA-1172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner contends that the District of Columbia Taxicab Commission failed to follow the procedures prescribed by its regulations in considering the exceptions which petitioner noted to a proposed decision of a hearing examiner imposing two civil fines for taxicab infractions specified in 31 DCMR § 825.1 (1990). We conclude that while the process by which the Commission rendered its decision may have been defective, that defect provides no basis for reversing the decision, as the Commission rejected the merits of petitioner’s challenge to the examiner’s imposition of the fines, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Regional Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- APARTMENT AND OFFICE BUILDING ASSOCIATION OF v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- MacAuley v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington v. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia, the People's Counsel of the District of Columbia, and Potomac Electric Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Asefu Alemayehu v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Asefu Alemayehu v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014