Legal Opinion
Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1990No. 88-802PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Goodman asks us to review a decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission holding that his landlord, Graybill, was entitled to claim exemption from rent stabilization under the so-called “small landlord” provision of the Rental Housing Act. See D.C.Code § 45-1516(a)(3) (1981). 1 This section excludes from coverage “any rental unit in any housing accommodation of 4 or fewer units.” Id.) see Blacknall v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 544 A.2d 710, 711 (D.C.1988). He also contends that he was denied the opportunity to present favorable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Twyman v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re O.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cruz v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.