Legal Opinion
MacAuley v. District of Columbia Taxicab Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1993No. 91-AA-376PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner, a taxicab driver, appeals from a decision imposing a $50 civil fine for “loitering,” purportedly rendered pursuant to regulations of the Taxicab Commission. 1 Because the procedures followed by the administrative agency do not follow those set forth in its own regulations, we vacate the decision and remand for further proceedings.
A
Alerted to the necessity of dealing with the issue of a remand, 2 the government conceded at oral argument that administrative proceedings for violations such as the one charged to appellant are governed by 31 DCMR ch. 4, entitled “Hearing Procedures…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Seman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Le Chic Taxicab Co. v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nathalia L. Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Potomac Electrical Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Robinson v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Braddock v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re KitchingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.