Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Asefu Alemayehu v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2014No. 13-AA-518Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcleese, Associate Judge
I agree with the court that the Board’s ruling in this case was not tainted by the Board’s awareness that petitioner Alema-yehu had offered to settle the case and faced an investigation in another matter. I also agree with the court that the case should be remanded for the Alcohol Beverage Control Board to determine whether petitioner Alemayehu is a communication-impaired person within the meaning of the local statute governing the appointment of interpreters in judicial and administrative proceedings, D.C.Code § 2-1901 et seq. (2012 Repl.). I write separately on the latter point to provide a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Martin Medina TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Victor Luna v. Charles Black, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Bates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- D.C. Library Renaissance Project/West End Library Advisory Group v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Le Chic Taxicab Co. v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992