Legal Opinion
Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1983No. 82-114PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Associate Judge,
Retired:
The District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board (the Board) charged petitioner, a registered nurse, with professional misconduct 1 and after a hearing imposed a two year suspension of her license. Petitioner challenges the Board’s decision, arguing that the Board (1) failed to provide adequate notice of the charges against her; (2) improperly restricted cross-examination of an adverse witness; (3) lacked substantial evidence in the record to support its findings of .fact and conclusions of law; and (4) abused its discretion in imposing a two year penalty. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rodale Press, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wisconsin Avenue Nursing Home v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.