Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dion Washington-Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 29, 2016No. A14-460PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
This case arises out of a sex-trafficking operation. For his part in the operation, appellant Antonio Dion Washington-Davis was convicted of soliciting and promoting prostitution and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. 1 Washington-Davis argues that we should reverse his convictions because the statute that criminalizes the promotion and solicitation of prostitution, MinmStat. § 609.322, subd. la(l)-(2) (2014), is facially overbroad under the First Amendment. He also argues that the district court committed reversible error by giving plainly erroneous…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Adam John LilienthalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. HenselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. MuccioSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Linert v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.