Legal Opinion

Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1984No. 82-975PublishedCited by 2,106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Section 28.04 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code prohibits the posting of signs on public property.1 The question pre*792sented is whether that prohibition abridges appellees’ freedom of speech within the meaning of the First Amendment.2

In March 1979, Roland Vincent was a candidate for election to the Los Angeles City Council. A group of his supporters known as Taxpayers for Vincent (Taxpayers) entered into a contract with a political sign service company known as Candidates’ Outdoor Graphics Service (COGS) to fabricate and post signs with Vincent’s name on them. COGS produced 15- by 44-inch…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,106 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

2,101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API