Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
Section 28.04 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code prohibits the posting of signs on public property.1 The question pre*792sented is whether that prohibition abridges appellees’ freedom of speech within the meaning of the First Amendment.2
In March 1979, Roland Vincent was a candidate for election to the Los Angeles City Council. A group of his supporters known as Taxpayers for Vincent (Taxpayers) entered into a contract with a political sign service company known as Candidates’ Outdoor Graphics Service (COGS) to fabricate and post signs with Vincent’s name on them. COGS produced 15- by 44-inch…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,106 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
2,101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.