State v. Hensel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
This case requires. us to determine whether the part of Minnesota’s disorderly-conduct statute that prohibits “disturb[ing]” assemblies or meetings, Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(2) (2016), is unconstitutional pnder the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Both the district court and the court of appeals concluded that the statute is constitutional. Because Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(2), violates the First Amendment and there is no reasonable narrowing construction of the statute, we reverse.
FACTS.
The facts of this case, which arose out of two Little…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Back v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. Ortega-RodriguezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.